Things are moving in the right direction in spreading mobile
penetration in rural and remote areas, thanks to the USO administrator
initiative of providing infrastructure support for mobile services in rural and
remote areas. Plans are to spend around Rs 1,600 crore over a five-year period
to provide mobile connectivity to rural areas through service providers like
BSNL, Hutchison Essar, and IP-1 players like GTL Infrastructure, Nitel, Quipo,
and Reliance Infrastructure. All this will help in boosting rural economy which
can play a lead role in ensuring Indian economy to grow at 8-9% per annum.
On the rural spread, India has a total of 638,499 villages out
of which about 44,856 villages are uninhabited as per 2001 census. So, 594,000
inhabited villages account for 72.22% of the total population of India. Till
date, we have covered only 60% of India's geography, and a large part of rural
geography is yet to be covered. Infrastructure support for mobile services will
act as a catalyst for rural growth. Even in the past, the government has
provided a lot of support to rural people by deploying MARR (multi access rural
radio), and VPT (village public telephones). Presently, around 559,000 villages
have VPT, and for the remaining 35,000 villages, VPT are to be set up either on
satellite or on other technologies. The USO initiative of providing mobile
services will help in increasing mobile footprint in rural areas, as till date
communication in majority of the villages has been possible only through
community phones i.e. VPT or wireline phones.
Presently, 80% of the towers are located in urban areas, and
remaining 20% are in rural India. We are seeing a shift, and it is expected that
in couple of years it would be 60% in urban, and 40% in rural areas, as 70% of
the population resides there, and a lot of coverage is yet to happen. Indian
teledensity is at around 19%. Out of this, urban teledensity is at around
49.53%, and rural teledensity is at around 1.84%. There is a wide gap between
urban and rural teledensity, and the digital divide needs to be bridged. The
latest initiative will help in covering around 22% of India's population,
thereby providing mobile connections to people residing in remote and far-flung
areas.
In the latest bid, companies like BSNL, GIL, Hutchison Essar,
Nitel, Quipo, and Reliance Comm infrastructure will set up 7,871 mobile towers
in around 500 districts across India and would initially provide voice services.
The tower companies will be provided remuneration on a quarterly basis for a
period of five years from USO fund. Reimbursement will be in four quarterly
installments ie June 30, Sep 30, December 31, and March 31. Even the companies,
which are planning to share towers, have been finalized; BSNL leads the race
followed by Reliance Comm, Reliance Telecom, Bharti Airtel, Hutchison Essar,
Aircel, and Idea. Tata Teleservices is the only operator that doesn't have the
intention to share tower in the USO project. A single tower can be shared by a
maximum of three operators, and they are also paying a small bid amount to all
tower players. And, after the contract period, tower companies can make fresh
set of negotiations with mobile service providers. And, in the future, tower
companies can also extend to provide broadband services.
Financial
Bid Results for Part of USO
Company
State
Districts
Towers
USO Amount/Tower/Year
(in Rs)
USO Amount in 5 Years
(in Rs Crore)
GTL Infra
Andhra Pradesh
14
287
592,196
84.98
Assam
20
90
265,066
11.93
Uttar Pradesh (E)
13
134
141,333
9.47
Hutch Essar
Andhra Pradesh
5
200
388,081
38.81
Maharashtra
3
123
197,331
12.14
Sikkim
3
8
162,321
0.65
BSNL
Andhra Pradesh
3
94
157,833
7.42
Arunachal Pradesh
12
62
202,316
6.27
Bihar
37
489
393,908
96.31
Chattisgarh
12
349
310,014
54.10
Gujarat
4
66
73,198
2.42
Haryana
8
14
71,738
0.50
Himachal Pradesh
9
191
204,642
19.54
Jammu and Kashmir
12
178
379,465
33.77
Jharkhand
14
189
143,212
13.53
Karnataka
26
427
399,773
85.35
Madhya Pradesh
45
985
682,840
336.30
Maharashtra
30
894
737,324
329.58
Manipur
9
95
212,185
10.08
Nagaland
7
56
212,185
5.94
Orissa
25
316
255,673
40.40
Punjab
3
13
67,004
0.44
Rajasthan
32
411
447,278
91.92
Tamil Nadu
27
371
284,259
52.73
Tripura
4
147
255,912
18.81
Uttaranchal
13
217
284,070
30.82
Uttar Pradesh (E)
32
371
400,161
74.23
Uttar Pradesh (W)
10
73
132,714
4.84
West Bengal
16
167
134,336
11.22
Nitel
Chattisgarh
4
211
416,098
43.90
Meghalaya
7
102
223,299
11.39
Mizoram
8
71
274,599
9.75
Reliance Comm Infra
Himachal Pradesh
2
104
156,480
8.14
Jharkhand
4
116
159,000
9.22
Kerala
11
46
98,700
2.27
Orissa
5
116
159,000
9.22
Quipo
Uttar Pradesh (W)
11
88
100,000
4.40
Total
500
7,871
9,775,544
1582.78
The bid document for services in rural areas specifies that 50%
of the site is to be rolled out within eight months, and remaining within 12
months period of signing the agreement. The agreement for tower providers is
valid for a period of six and a half years, unless revoked earlier for reasons
specified elsewhere. To make the system foolproof, the tower area will have a
security cabin to provide shelter for guard for protecting the property, and
also maintaining stock of diesel, batteries, and others. Apart from this, there
would be provision of recharging of mobile handsets, so that people don't have
to go to far off places to charge their handsets.
Service providers are exploring all possibilities of reducing
cost and time to rollout services in rural areas. This new initiative of USO
administrator will help in reducing capex by around 25-40%, as it not only
allows passive sharing but also, with the recent recommendations, active
infrastructure sharing and backhaul on a suo moto basis. The regulator has even
recommended amendment in the license condition to allow active infrastructure
sharing limited to antenna, feeder cable, NodeB, radio access network, and
transmission systems. Another major initiative is backhaul sharing for mobile
services in rural and far-flung areas. The authority has recommended amendment
in the license conditions to allow service providers to share their backhaul
from base trans receiver station to base station controller. It has been noted
that such a sharing is permitted on optical fiber as well as radio medium at
certain nodes. And, in rural areas it is all the more important, as majority of
towers are ground based and per tower cost is high (presently, tower and
backhaul connectivity account for 50-60% of the cost). All this will help in
creating rural infrastructure at low cost, and in eliminating digital divide.
Pravin Prashant
pravinp@cybermedia.co.in