Panel Discussion on QoS 

author-image
Voice&Data Bureau
New Update

Customer care has hardly been a top-of-mind issue for any business in India,
telecom being no exception. However, with more competition and little to
differentiate in core technology, service quality is emerging as the most
effective competitive tool.

Advertisment

While service providers have slowly but surely recognized this, ensuring
service quality remains a tough task, identification of priorities being the
initial, but most crucial hurdle. VOICE&DATA thought that the best way to do
that would be a brainstorming session involving the top executives in
regulatory, industry and user organizations.

Rajendra
Singh,
advisor, TRAI, delivering
the opening note

Addressing
QoS:

Quality
of service is ultimately the customer’s perception. There
are three aspects of achieving QoS. First, parameters
practicable should be set.. Second, we should be able to
monitor the service providers on those parameters. Third, they
should be enforced. From the customer’s point of view, there
are two categories of QoS. One, technical parameters of the
network. And two, the human interface. You may have great
network and state-of-the-art technologies but the kind of
people interfacing with the customer matters.

Implementing
QoS:

At the network designing stage, parameters should be defined.
The next stage is defining the delivery parameters.

TRAI’s
role:

We are monitoring all telecom services quarterly. In future,
the biggest challenge will be to set up end-to-end QoS
parameters for multimedia networks. Also, more thought must be
put on the aspect of sharing of resources by service
providers. Today, sharing of BTS is being talked about in pure
commercial terms. Nobody has yet thought on the lines of the
effect that it could have on QoS.

It invited members from the regulatory, service providers, and user
fraternity to discuss and set out the agenda. Rajendra Singh, senior advisor to
TRAI, started the proceedings, with a presentation on QoS from the TRAI
perspective, followed by a user perspective presented by Anil Kumar of Telecom
Watchdog.

Advertisment

The discussion that followed was moderated by Vishnu Goel, managing director,
Acterna.

The panel discussed the fact that in spite of more operators being in the
fray, the quality of service had not really measured up to the rising
expectations of the customer.

The panel suggested that the state of things would improve once the new
operators started testing out their services and giving SLAs and guarantees, or
the incumbents took it upon themselves to fill the existing gaps, especially on
the customer care front.

Advertisment
KH Khan

CGM, Delhi, MTNL
“Are we to define quality of service for the whole nation or just the urban and semi-urban areas?”a

KH Khan

On TRAI’s efforts: I don’t think the guidelines are enough. What is
the point of saying that you will achieve a particular level of QoS, when it is
practicably not possible. In a place where there is no competition, what is the
point of a regulator finding out QoS of an incumbent? Is there any alternative
for the customer?

Urban-rural QoS divide: I don’t think it is practical to define the
same quality of service throughout the nation. The resources needed will be
enormous and may not be worthwhile. Should we have the same kind of QoS for the
general consumer or the business customer? I think there has to be a difference.

Advertisment
Sudipta Sen

managing director, Comsat Max
“The attitude of serving the client in the proper manner should set in at all the customer touchpoints.”

Sudipta Sen

On role of technology: While we do have an SLA to define parameters such
as availability, the challenge is to keep the same level of quality as the
network grows. That’s where we use technology a lot. If there is a hub down at
any of my sites, I automatically get an SMS on my cellphone, generated by the
system.

Investments in QoS: We have been investing in three key areas. One,
what technology is to be implemented at what time. Two, the methods and
processes. Three, the human capital–the attitude of serving the client should
set in at all the customer touchpoints.

Advertisment
Amitabh Singhal

secretary, ISPAI
“We have to consistently reinvent ourselves, and have measurement criteria built into our network.”

Amitabh Singhal

On ISP-related QoS issues: Quality has to be a national issue. We as an
industry today compete globally. It is not just the matter of survival for the
industry, it is also for the businesses that depend upon connectivity. In
December, TRAI came out with the guidelines for ISPs. There was a mismatch
between what was expected out of us and what we can seek as customers of basic
operators.

MODERATOR
Vishnu Goel, managing director, Acterna
“Whenever there is a quality of service issue, there is a search for a scapegoat.”
Advertisment

QoS relating to Internet telephony: This is an area where an entire
range of telecom service providers has to do several things to make the customer
get the expected QoS. TRAI says that it will constitute a high-level committee
to look into issues of interoperability which is also an integral part when you
try to establish some sort of QoS.

Deepak Maheshwari

On what is QoS: Quality of service is not just a desire or a dream. It is
something for which the customer is paying.

Deepak
Maheshwari

head, technical chapter, ISPAI
“Quality
of service is not just a desire or a dream. It is something
for which the customer is paying.”
Advertisment

Investments in QoS: When it comes to the Internet, there are a lot of
investments going in. Here, the problem is of another nature. The whole gamut of
services, the various technologies, the type of solutions that are available–everything
changes so fast that here the CFOs, without going into viability and RoIs, ask
how long will it be before the network will require an upgrade. Here, typically
the upgrades like Diffserv, and MPLS cost very high.

Shankar Halder

CTO, Escotel
“You have to spend on the network. The risk is far more in having not spent correctly at the right time.”

Shankar Halder

On the role of the regulator: Specifying some quality standards, not
really saying how it actually relates to the perception of the customer, is
something which we have to revisit. Probably two years down the line, it will be
absolutely uncontrollable. Who will monitor the quality of service? To my mind,
it has to be left to the market.

Investments in QoS: It is clear that you have to invest on the
network. However, it is not so easy to get funds even on the network front. But
one must understand here that if you don’t make the strategic investments at
the right point of time, you will lose out to the competition.

P Ganesh,

Deputy Director General, Strategic Planning, BSNL
“Standardization is crucial for new services and technologies to coexist with the old technologies.”

P Ganesh

On what is QoS:
The issue of standardization is very crucial. This is to
enable all the new services and new technologies to coexist with the old
technologies. The other issues are that of reliability–reliability of 99.999–and
interoperability

Investments in QoS: One obstacle for us is the legacy network. New
technologies promise better QoS and better customer service. Investments are
being made on these and they are being integrated into the legacy network while
the legacy network is slowly being phased out.

Rajiv Kataria

COO, Tata Teleservices
“Quality of service is definitely a customer issue and network and all other things are a means to provide that.”

Rajiv Kataria

On QoS being a customer issue:
The customer is not really bothered about the
technical jargons such as bit error rate, downtime rate and all these things.
What he wants to know is if he places an order how fast will he get his service.
If there is a problem, how quickly it will be resolved. And what is the average
time and the maximum time. If I am a subscriber of multiple services, how will I
be billed. QoS is definitely a customer issue.

Investments in QoS: Network investments are easily justifiable.

Alok Kumar

Chief, Operations, Bharti Touchtel
“You go to your CFO saying one satisfied customer will get you eight more. That does not work.”

Alok Kumar

On having a UCO fund:
Up till now, we have had USO fund. Now, can we have
something called universal customer obligation (UCO) fund created which drives
the regulator then ensures the measurement system is transparent and nobody
doubts it? The fund can be used to reward the top achievers of QoS parameters in
each service segments.

Investments in QoS: Though everybody feels this investment is a good
one, where one fails is in having a measurement system of how the investments on
QoS pays back.

Nareshchandra Laishram