Dialog to settle interconnection charges among several operators is still an
unsettled issue in India. Since the number of operators making inroads into the
domestic market is on the rise, the issue is set to heat up. Many greenfield
operators are taking more time to launch their services because of the delay in
getting positive response to settle interconnect issues with the established
players.
In Sri Lanka, Bharti Airtel faced unnecessary delay in signing interconnect
agreements with the local operators when it tried to launch its services in
2008-09. With each country having its own formula, this may be a global issue.
But India has the maximum number of telecom operators. Cooperation among telcos
will be the only solution to solve such issues.
Beyond the finalization of interconnect charges, operators negotiate to
assess collocation charges. Collocation is the cost involved in the installation
of equipment by the interconnection seeker in the premises of the
interconnection provider. Collocation involves facilities such as security, site
maintenance, electrical installations, backup power, fire detection and fire
fighting systems, land, building, apparatus and plants, environment conditioning
services, etc.
According to operators, the fixation of infrastructure charges by service
providers in some cases is done arbitrarily and is not based on the use of sound
criteria. The mighty operator is trying to flex muscles and fix their own
charges hurting new operators' business plans. In this context, the consultation
paper on collocation charges by Trai is a timely one.
According to the telecom regulator, the process for assessing collocation
charges should be transparent and the charges themselves should be
non-discriminatory in terms of quality, provisioning and pricing. In the current
scenario, discussions are not happening between two equal players and chances
for bringing transparency may be bleak.
Strengthening of the sharing of infrastructure concept will be the best
solution to all operators who are feeling the heat because of the per-second
billing plans. Operators who are advocating for infrastructure sharing should
get more incentives. In a sharing atmosphere, cost can be assessed easily. There
will be more transparency.
Operators should be able to assess business gains following infrastructure
sharing. There can be certain targets set by the regulator. If the cost is
shared among several operators who are negotiating for collocation charges, it
will improve both the bottomline and topline. Besides, green telecom will not
become a neglected subject by the Indian operators.
Baburajan K
baburajank@cybermedia.co.in