Advertisment

TRANSMISSION EQUIPMENT: Rule of Four

author-image
VoicenData Bureau
New Update

Technology Options

Advertisment

n SDH: Optical

fiber has vast capacity and it needs to be accessed by a protocol that can

support high data rates of up to 10 Gbps per wavelength or 40 Gbps in future.

The protocol also provides reliability and an extensive range of network

monitoring and management functions. The protocol used in modern networks to

satisfy the above features is called Synchronous Digital Hierarchy (SDH). SDH is

placed at the bottom of the protocol stack in the physical layer, along with the

very fiber upon which it transmits its signal. The fundamental principle of the

SDH protocol is time-division multiplexing (TDM). TDM ensures that there is a

constant stream of data travelling through the network and taking advantage of

the fiber bandwidth available. Lower bit-rate streams of information are

combined, or multiplexed, up into higher bit-rate streams at the native bit rate

of the SDH system. The fundamental SDH frame is known as STM1 (synchronous

transport module). Each provides a bit rate of 155 Mbps with a total frame size

of around 20 kbps.

n DWDM: Called

dense wavelength division multiplexing, technology increases bandwidth over

existing fiber optic cable by multiplexing (communicating two or more signals

over a common channel) several optical signals on to one fibre, turning it into

a virtual multiple fibre and thereby increasing its load-carrying capacity by

many times over. SDH and DWDM are complimentary in nature with DWDM at the

backbone and SDH at the



access.

n CWDM: Coarse

Wavelength Division Multiplexing is an older WDM technology and is now emerging

as a low-cost alternative to DWDM especially in metro network access and

enterprise applications. It is a simple device enabling quick rollout of network

services without compromising on the performance of the network. It provides all

kinds of services like TDM services, data services, data center services, and

cable video services. CWDM is 50 percent cheaper than DWDM.

Advertisment

n ASON (ION):

Called Automatically Switched Optical Network or Intelligent Optical Network,

the technology provides the best features of all the technologies presently

available. It provides the best network architecture and one also has the

provision to deploy the services quickly.

Buying Tips

n Understanding

One’s Requirement:
Service providers planning to deploy transmission equipment

for their network should first evaluate their network. First, they should decide

whether they plan to do the deployment on their own or they plan to take the

help of equipment manufacturers. Second, they should be clear what to deploy and

not as vague requirement can lead to additional costs, thereby increasing the

capital expenditure. Third, the operator should interact with the vendors to

know how are they going to fulfill the company’s requirement (technical as

well as operational).

Advertisment

n Flexible

Design:
The network should help in providing connection through multiple rings

so that if one ring goes down it does not affect the network and the traffic can

be routed to other rings. The flexibility should be in terms of cross

connection, availability of types of interfaces/services, and support technology

and application evolution. Vendors should provide powerful cross connection

capabilities. In terms of interfaces, the equipment should provide prevailing

TDM capabilities–E1, DS3, STM-1, STM-4, and STM-16; emerging technologies–ESCON

and FICON; and IP technologies–ATM, IP, Ethernet, and gigabit Ethernet. All

these features will vary depending on metro, regional, or backbone

infrastructure.

n Network

Management:
The service provider should see whether the network management

supports multiple vendor interconnects or not and ensures reliable and

consistent service. It seems ITU is developing a network management system that

can manage equipment of any vendor in a given network. This platform requires

two key interface such as CORBA and Q3. These platforms are evolving. If one can

guarantee these platforms then it is future proof for a multivendor scenario.

n Scalability and

Upgradability:
Generally, all vendors in the transmission space provide

scalability and upgradability but one has to look at what prices and compare

them. Also, one should be aware about the upgradability of the equipment and

whether high-end equipment supports all the features provided by its earlier

counterpart. One should also be able to expand the network without making the

existing equipment redundant.

Advertisment

n Protection

Features:
The vendor should provide both equipment and network protection. The

vendors should specify if the network is cut how to make the make hardware

operational. The service provider should check whether protection mechanisms are

built in the product or not. If not, the carrier should consider additional

investment that will be required for this facility.

n Financial

Backing:
In the last two to three years lot of companies have mushroomed in the

transmission equipment segment. But with things slowing down lot of companies

are hardly making any significant investment in R&D. Before buying any

product, carriers should look into the R&D investment of the company and its

future commitment. One should also look at future roadmap of the company before

opting for any product.

Market Information

Advertisment

India is moving closer to the NTP ’99 dream of achieving a teledensity of

seven by the year 2005 and 15 by year 2010, from the present level of five.

There has been a good growth on the wireless front but even wireline has grown

pretty well. The basic services has grown by around 18 percent (in terms of

number of subscribers) in FY 2002. It seems in India one will witness a higher

growth on the wireless front now that we have two technologies, GSM as well as

CDMA and both of them have a good reach in terms of number of circles.

Difference

between DWDM and CWDM
Feature DWDM CWDM
Number

of wavelengths
32 or more

(C, L band)
4/8/16 (O,

S, E, S, C, L band)
Channel

spacing
50/100/200

GHz (0.4/0.8/1.6 nm)
2,500

GHz (20 nm)
Channel

capacity
Up to 10G Up

to 2.5G
Power

balancing
Yes No
Laser

type
Cooled DFB Uncooled

DFB
Cooling

requirement
Yes No
Filter

technology
Thin

film (large number of layers), 
AWG,

Bragg grating
Thin film

(few number of layer)
Span

distances
640 km (with nodes at longer

distances)
80

km (with nodes at shorter distances)
Cost

effectiveness
Very

expensive
Cheaper by

50 percent
Applications High capacity long haul

Backbone, metro core and regional transmission networks
Metropolitan access and

enterprise networks

To realize that dream, all the telecom service providers as well as utility

companies in India are deploying large scale OFC in the country for building the

telecom infrastructure in the country. Most of the players have already deployed

a major portion of their network and some of them have started rolling out OFC

deployment to catch up with other service providers. Reliance is planning to

deploy 60,000 km, Bharti is opting for 24,000 km, and VSNL is opting for 17,000

km. On the other hand in the utilities sector, PGCIL has plans for 15,000 km,

and Railtel for 25,000 km. There is no doubt that, to deploy such massive

infrastructure in the country, one expects an increased demand of optical

transmission equipment and the demand will continue for couple of years.

Advertisment

The optical transmission market in India has been on an upswing with the

placing of orders by private companies–Tata Teleservices and Reliance and

utility companies–PGCIL, Railtel, and GAIL. It seems the upswing will continue

to be there for a couple of years as presently all the companies are either

augmenting their network or creating a nationwide infrastructure on which voice

and data services will be deployed. It is difficult to forecast the optical

transmission equipment market in India for FY 2002-03 as projects are under

different stages. In some of the projects, the companies are still in the tender

or RFP stage. In some cases, the orders have been finalized but not delivered

and in some cases the orders have been delivered but still under implementation

stage and there is a possibility that it might spill over in the next fiscal.

So, there are all kinds of probabilities.

In FY 2002-03, the optical transmission equipment market in India is

estimated to be in the range of Rs 750—800 crore and the growth has been

estimated at around 7-14 percent. The above value does not include optical

transmission equipment deployed by i2i submarine cable network connecting

Chennai and Singapore. As most of the optical transmission projects run for 2—3

years we have tried to take only the fiscal figures in our estimation.

Nortel is currently the number one player. Even new entrants like Huawei and

ZTE have done pretty well. All the major multinational players are present in

the country either directly or indirectly. In terms of geographies, Nortel,

Tellabs, and Sycamore represents the American continent; Alcatel, Marconi, and

Siemens represents Europe whereas Huawei and ZTE represent Asia. Huawei is

represented through HFCL, ZTE is represented through UTL and ARM, and Sycamore

is represented through Tejas. Also in the space are Indian players like Fibcom,

ITI and HTL, a HFCL Group company. The Indian players except Fibcom are mostly

focussing on SDH technology whereas Nortel, Huawei, ZTE, Sycamore, Siemens,

Alcatel, and Marconi are focussing on both SDH and DWDM technology.

Advertisment

The growth of transmission equipment in the country is dependent on growth of

DELs, geographical spread of DELs, increase in Internet usage, increase in BPO/call

center operations, increase in software development centers, percolation of

e-governance to taluka level and others.

EXPERTS

PANEL

AM

Gopalakrishnan,


associate vice-president (technical) Fibcom India
CS Rao,

country manager and director (SAARC region), Tellabs
Rajan

Mehta,
vice

president, Nortel Networks India
Ramdev

Sharma,
head

(product marketing), Huawei Telecommunications India

Infrastructure Deployment by Service Providers

With the competition creeping in, BSNL, the leader in optical transmission

deployment in the country, has been trying to upgrade its network to cope up

with the emerging demand of voice and data in the country due to decrease in

cost of STD and ISD services in the country. At present, the company has an

overall capacity of 326,271 rkm (as on 31 March 2002) and has been buying large

amount of SDH equipment. However, it is expected that the focus will now be more

on enhancing the delivery network and opting for more of STM-1 and STM-4

equipment. Even MTNL has upgraded its network to carry any increase in traffic

and it seems there would be only a small incremental value in this fiscal.

Tata, the integrated telecom player in the country is planning big as the

company has to deploy backbone both on the basic services and DLD fronts. Tata

Teleservices is planning to spend around Rs 80 crore in a three-year timeframe

in all the four new circles. It seems that for all the circles, Marconi was

awarded the contract but the company was unable to fulfill its promise and so

the Delhi contract was awarded to Fibcom. Another Tata Group company, VSNL is

implementing the domestic long distance project for Tata and the company is

planning to deploy a mix of SDH and DWDM. Plans are to deploy around 5,000 km of

OFC in this fiscal and around 7,000 km of OFC in the next fiscal.

Reliance is really planning big and plans are to launch broadband network in

2,000 odds town and cities by deploying 60,000 km of OFC in the country.

Regarding optical transmission, the company is planning for DWDM in the core and

SDH in the delivery and distribution network. The company is thinking of

deploying 64 channel STM-64 for the core backbone and SDH equipment like STM-1,

STM-4, and STM-16 on the delivery and distribution network. The company has

opted Nortel for the core network and Fibcom for the delivery network.

Bharti, the first company to launch DLD service in the country has deployed

around 18,000 km of OFC in the country and plans are to deploy another 6,000 km

in years to come. Initially for DLD, Bharti was planning to deploy DWDM

technology but seeing the demand projections the company opted for SDH. The

company has signed a long-term contract with Nortel whereby the company has been

supplying the equipment depending upon the demand. On the basic services front,

the company opted for Siemens for Karnataka and Tamil Nadu, and SDH order for

Delhi and Haryana was awarded to Alcatel.

In the utility sector, GAIL has been very active and the company has

commissioned the second phase of the project. The company, in the first phase,

is planning to deploy around 2,700 km of which 700 km is underground and the

rest is overhead. In the second phase, the company is planning to deploy another

12,000 km. Railtel, another utility company is planning to deploy around 25,000

km of OFC connecting around 2,500 cities by March 2003. The company has deployed

around 12,000 km of OFC. The company is planning to deploy STM-1 and STM-4 for

the delivery network and STM-16 for the backbone network.

Advertisment