6 November
1998. Private Internet Service Providers (ISPs) allowed in the
country. Following that several players have begun to provide
the services as either a national A, B or C category licensee.
Around 30 operators in all the circles started services to be
the early birds in the Internet market-place. Opening of private
services for a "common man" meant affordable Internet
access.
The under
currents that were expected to come overboard were better services
and accessibility at lower tariffs. Satyam Online, the country''s
first national private ISP, was anticipated to show and lead
the way. And it was a matter of time before the price war started.
At that time, Satyam could not afford to roll out services at
rates lower than VSNL as the network implementation costs and
other factors like depending on VSNL for bandwidth had to be
absorbed. It started out with rates that were equal to or marginally
higher than that of VSNL and what it chose to do was market
its brand name on the service platform. Slogans like "Off-the-shelf,
ready-to-use Internet. No more form filling. No more waiting
in queues," were used as its sales pitch.
The question
being asked after one year of liberalization of the services
is, has the quality of Internet access improved and tariffs
reduced? It has been seen that the market, when allowed to dictate
terms, finally brings the prices down. In the year that has
transpired, the tariffs-even though not substantially lowered-have
marginally dropped. Despite the fact that only a few companies
like Satyam and Bharti-BT along with MTNL can compete with VSNL
on providing Internet access at the national level.
Things are
likely to be much better on the price front once the local ISPs
raise their hoods. There are already a handful of them operating
in several states and cities across the country. But, they have
not yet made a significant impact yet. They might have spread
the Net to newer regions but not enough has happened to make
the Net as popular as it is aching to be. Most private ISPs
are blind to the Indian market''s legendary price sensitivity.
Rather, they seem to believe that better services for a slightly
higher price would be more attractive in this segment.
The trouble
is that before the private ISPs were allowed in, VSNL had the
monopoly over Internet access business and the gateway connectivity.
Being the only ISP between 1995 and 1998, it caught the first
wave of early adopters and the second wave of elite users. When
the private ISPs came in, all that the VSNL had to do was to
hold back its subscribers by not giving them a chance to migrate
to other ISPs. This was attempted through regular price drops.
With its free control over the Internet bandwidth, VSNL was
seen to have much more muscles than one thought. Only one ISP
could think of matching the behemoth in pricing. And that was
MTNL with its active local network in India''s two most lucrative
cities-Mumbai and Delhi.
lies the fear of the private ISPs. They have to connect to the
Internet through VSNL, and have to depend on MTNL/DoT for the
telephone lines that deliver the Internet access to one''s doorstep.
If these two want, they can actually reduce the Internet access
industry into a no-contest in terms of pricing. According to
Pradeep Lakshmanan, vice-president (Internet sales), Satyam
Infoway, the cost of bandwidth, the infrastructure equipment
like routers, switches, and value-added services like the CDs
that have licensed software on it, are counted before deciding
on the tariff. The bandwidth and prices of the local telephone
lines are the most important factors in the long run. And, in
a scenario where the two most important components are in the
hands of competition (VSNL and MTNL), things can get only tougher.
Also the question of unhealthy practices by the monopolies often
arise. Private ISPs can only struggle to keep pace with these
two ISPs in terms of pricing.
A partial
solution to the private ISP''s dilemma is to set up one''s own
gateway. Satyam Online and Mantra Online are planning to reduce
the prices after setting up their own gateways. But again there
is no time frame for this.
How soon
will the government allow private gateways? How long will the
financing and implementation of such a project take? Moreover,
a private gateway is just a partial solution. What about the
local telephone lines? No telco, other than DoT and MTNL, has
an extensive telephone network. Hence it appears that waiting
is the only option available presently.
However,
the real value-addition in both pricing and product could come
in another arena somewhat distant from the access and bandwidth
brouhaha. And that area is Corporate Internet access and Internet
commerce. Though both of these require reliable Internet connection,
security and government laws are their main stumbling blocks.
The Cyber Laws Bill is in the threshold of being debated in
the parliament and will possibly be passed as a law. Things
could be much better then.