The annual survey of Indian communications industry done by VOICE&DATA
ranks the equipment vendors in almost 30 segments. The survey brings out market
leaders in various segments but there are many companies that either go
unnoticed or do not make it to the list of top companies. Nevertheless, the
contribution made by these companies in the overall growth of the industry
cannot be discounted. Though it is not possible to bring out all such companies,
VOICE&DATA picked up a few in various segments and tried to assess how these
companies would fare in the FY 2005–06.
Crouching Dragons
In carrier class equipment, Chinese companies like ZTE, Huawei, UT Starcom
have been giving the traditional giants like Cisco, Ericsson, Nortel, Alcatel,
and Siemens a run for their money. The recent $19-billion, BT's
next-generation network deal with Huawei has again launched the specter of
threat from the Chinese companies to the traditional equipment vendors, even on
their home turf. And, this time price points were not a concern. It is a reality
that these companies have arrived and are here to stay. They have already forced
a huge slide in the cost of equipment and they have also proved themselves in
carrier-grade equipment technologies.
In
high-growth markets like India, almost all the telecom operators-in private
and public sector-are expanding and buying equipment across technologies and
there is enough scope for the survival for all companies. But, till now the
major portion of revenue for ZTE, Huawei, or UT Starcom was flowing in from the
BSNL/MTNL tenders. These vendors have the full range of offerings and unless
there is regulatory requirement for partnership they are capable of supplying
carrier equipment, enterprise equipment, customer premise equipment, and even
handsets.
The importance of India in the boardrooms of these companies is highlighted
from the fact they have been investing heavily here both in terms of setting up
manufacturing units, R&D and testing centers, and also expanding their
employee base.
The companies
ZTE has set up a manufacturing unit at Manesar near Delhi, and Huawei is
evaluating a similar move this year. These factories come in addition to their
R&D units in Bangalore. Last year ZTE registered its 100 percent Indian
subsidiary-ZTE Kangxun India. They are also expanding their Gurgaon office to
become the head office for Southeast Asian operations. The India office would
now cater to the SAARC countries, Myanmar, Malaysia, and the Philippines and
would be a hub for supplying equipment to these countries.
UT Starcom has an R&D center at Bangalore and a complete equipment
testing facility at Gurgaon. The company has invested over $50 million in India.
For the company these centers support almost 50 percent of global development
work related to 2G and 3G CDMA data, voice-over-IP (VoIP), and personal
communication management systems (PCMS), and unified messaging solutions.
In the last financial year the revenue for ZTE was around Rs 300 crore. It
executed CDMA projects for BSNL and MTNL on one hand, and supplied end-to-end
GSM solutions to BPL and Spice Telecom on the other. For BPL, the company
supplied caller ring back tunes (CRBT) solutions and also placed bids for BSNL
tender along with CellNext.
Huawei had revenues of around Rs 160 crore with a Rs 500 crore order in hand.
The company got 70 percent of Rs 190 crore National Internet Backbone project (NIBII)
project. In the private sector they are supplying IN to Spice in the Karnataka
circle and also have orders from Reliance for FWTs and are in talks for CDMA
infrastructure products. On the transmission side, Huawei had a small order from
HFCL Infotel for $1 million.
UT Starcom in India is known for its broadband equipments and last year it
entered the GSM handset market in the retail segment too. Though the company
lost a Reliance deal in FY 2004–05, it bagged the Rs 40.5 crore deal for BSNL's
National Internet Backbone II project for deployment of its Total Control(R)
1000 multi-service access platform and related equipment. It also got the
75,000-port, DSLAM tender from BSNL, which was an extension of the NIB II
project.
On the broadband front, ZTE along with Atlas Interactive is implementing a
four-city $100 million project for BSNL. The company has also bagged another
BSNL order for $1 billion and has done trials with MTNL for ADSL modems.
Similarly, UTStarcom has done trials with Bharti. Huawei has been doing pilots
for IPTV and ADSL modems with HFCL as partner.
In the current financial year, everyone has targets keeping in mind the 47
million-line tender from BSNL and MTNL on the mobile telephony side. They are
also eyeing a huge chunk of the broadband networks being planned by Bharti, BSNL,
and MTNL. On the CDMA side, ZTE and Huawei would be good competition for Lucent
and Motorola who have traditionally been the prime suppliers to PSUs, Tata
Indicom, and Reliance.
Though no vendor would like to be left out of the great Indian telecom party,
the Chinese companies would be the ones who would be closely watched for their
price points, technologies, and ability to recreate the China-like success in
India.
Creating Success Wirelessly
In all the wireless frenzy that gripped Indian networking market last year,
one company made a silent entry and struck gold in WLANs. Santa Clara-based
Netgear joined hands with distributors and resellers in India and straight away
became the third-largest WLAN vendor in India. Global revenue for the company is
around $383 million and has been growing at almost 28 percent. Though its India
revenue of Rs 5.5 crore is way behind the market leaders like Cisco (Rs 41 crore)
and D-Link (Rs 22 crore), Netgear has pushed players out like Dax and Proxim to
take its place in the hierarchy.
As a vendor, Netgear gained tremendous acceptability in both the enterprise
and home-SOHO space. Netgear products gained a lot of mind share and volumes as
its three distributors promoted them extensively across India. This company
would be worth tracking while the number of WLANs and hotspots increases in the
Indian market.
In the network integration space Houston Technologies and Gemini
Communication are registering good growth rates.
Gemini came up strongly as a competitor to Tulip, who successfully
implemented the Mallapuram project. The company has grew almost 41 percent in a
year. Not only did the Gemini grow in wireless networks, network security, and
LAN-WAN analyzers but it also entered new areas like RFID. With a few players in
the RFID space, Gemini is expecting almost 200 percent growth from current
revenues of Rs 1.6 crore.
Last year Gemini also bagged a pre-WiMax wireless broadband network project
for three major telecom operators in India for around Rs 40 crore. The company
also implemented MTNL's Garuda SDH project in Delhi for Rs 8 crore. With a
target of Rs 100 crore revenue this year, Gemini would be giving a tough time to
its competition.
Houston is a traditional OSS/BSS company, which forayed into the network
integration and consulting space with great success. Between FY 2003-04 and FY
2004-05, the company revenue jumped from Rs 15 crore to Rs 50 crore. Within a
span of four years the company registered a 233 percent growth. The success
comes due to a shift of strategy to mix network integration market with the OSS
business. Though OSS/BSS still contributes Rs 22.37 crore to the overall
revenues of the company, in FY 2005–06 integration and consulting business is
likely to pick up for the company.
Softswitches Makes Things Harder
Veraz Networks is another company to be watched closely, as the telecom
operators expand their networks. It was last year that the US-based company set
up its India office and a research and development center at Pune. Recently the
company announced an additional $5 million investment for the Pune center.
The annual revenue for Veraz is almost $70 million of which almost 15 percent
comes from the Indian market. The company offers softswitch-based communications
services and toll-quality, packet telephony solutions for carriers. Last year
the company bagged a $10 million static trunking deal from BSNL. The project has
been implemented.
Though the traditionally the company targeted multi-service operators and
mobile operators, now it has moved focus towards the BPO industry too with its
new network compression solution for multi-city and multi-country call centers.
The company has orders worth $5 million from four BPO clients for the FY 2005–06.
Veraz has a target of $20 million for this financial year and is banking on
class 4 switches for the MSOs as their long distance traffic is seen to rise.
Veraz in India would be commanding a major market share with its softswitches
and would like to cash in on the BPO boom.
Anurag Prasad
Page(s) 1