After Wi-Fi and Bluetooth, ZigBee is the one now making noises. Though ZigBee
is used for data transfer on devices within a
personal or small area network, it is not being positioned as a threat to the
existing technologies. It is targeted towards networked sensing, monitoring, and
controlling applications rather than actual data transfer on Wi-Fi or file
transfer over Bluetooth.
ZigBee is supposed to do what Wi-Fi or Bluetooth are not doing-two-way
communication between multiple devices over simple networks using very less
power and at very low cost. It uses the free 2.4 GHz band and the IEEE-defined
802.15.4 standard. And, unlike many wireless licensed technologies it is an open
standard. ZigBee typically transfers a few bytes of sensor readings between
devices, it requires very low bandwidth, and low power. In fact, the low power
proposition gives it an edge over Bluetooth.
In December 2004, ZigBee 1.0 was accepted as an official standard and it is
mandatory for companies to be member of the ZigBee Alliance for manufacturing
Zigbee products. Today the alliance has over 100 members including Ember,
Honeywell, Philips, Samsung, and Motorola who are working towards rolling out
ZigBee devices.
The initial markets earmarked for ZigBee are: home control, building
automation, and industrial automation. The underlying benefit is remote control
of multiple systems and their flexible management. In the home and building
segment this can be extended to lighting, heating, air conditioning, and
security systems. In the industrial segment it can be used to improve asset
management and extend existing manufacturing and process control systems
reliably.
Once volumes pick up and acceptance of the technology increases, newer
application like patient and fitness monitoring systems in hospitals will come
up. On a larger scale, one could also expect environmental monitoring and energy
management applications.
While we wait for ZigBee to make its commercial entry and prove its
efficiency, big noises are being made about its deployment and the moolah it can
bring in. Frost & Sullivan not only predicts $700 million in ZigBee chipset
sale by 2008-up 3400 percent from the $18.8 million in 2004-but it also says
there would be minimum of 100 to 150 ZigBee chips in every home in the world in
the next two to three years.
| Comparison
of Wireless Standards |
| Market
Name |
ZigBee |
GPRS/GSM |
Wi-Fi |
Bluetooth |
| Standard |
802.15.4 |
1xRTT/CDMA |
802.11b |
802.15.1 |
| Application
Focus |
Monitoring
& Control |
Wide
Area Voice & Data |
Web,
Email, Video |
Cable
Replacement |
| System
Resources |
4Kb
- 32 Kb |
16Mb+ |
1Mb+ |
250Kb+ |
| Battery
Life (Days) |
100-1,000+ |
38,359 |
.5-5 |
7-Jan |
| Network
Size |
Unlimited
(264) |
1 |
32 |
7 |
| Bandwidth
(Kb/s) |
20-250 |
64-128+ |
11,000+ |
720 |
| Transmission
Range (Meters) |
1-100+ |
1000+ |
1-100 |
1-10+ |
| Success
Metrics |
Reliability,
Power, Cost |
Reach,
Quality |
Speed,
Flexibility |
Cost,
Convenience |
|
Source: ZigBee
Alliance |
|
According to another report by Industrial Wireless Sensor Networking, almost
85.9 million industrial wireless sensor network nodes would be deployed by 2010
with 85 percent of them being ZigBee nodes. West Technology Research Solutions
says almost 19 million ZigBee chips would be shipped in 2006. ABI Research puts
almost one million devices on ZigBee in 2005.
Though only time would check the veracity of these figures, the wireless
technology certainly seems to be going on a hype crest. Not long ago Bluetooth
was also projected to bring a revolution in data transfer within devices in the
personal area network, but they have gained some acceptance only when
applications over mobile phones were proven. ZigBee has to demonstrate its
usefulness and usage efficiency, without which acceptance level might not be as
high as predicted.
Anurag Prasad
Page(s) 1